martinenserink - Tweet Data Analysis
Tweets Analysis - Keyword: @martinenserink
نُشر في 21 إبريل، 2023
نظرة عامة
Tweets covering
6 days
Latest tweet was on
2023-02-27
Earliest tweet was on
2023-02-20
Total number of tweets analysed
14
Average age of authors' accounts
9 years
أنواع التغريدات
Number of Retweets
4
28% من الإجمالي
Number of Original tweets
0
0% من الإجمالي
Number of tweets that were Quotes
0
0% من الإجمالي
Number of tweets that were Replies
10
71% من الإجمالي
Number of tweets that contain Hashtags
1
7% من الإجمالي
Number of tweets that contain Mentions
14
100% من الإجمالي
الأجهزة المستخدمة للتغريد
أهم 5 أجهزة
| Source | Count |
|---|---|
| Twitter Web App | 10 |
| Twitter for iPhone | 3 |
| Twitter for Android | 1 |
توزيع الأجهزة
أهم 10 حسابات حسب المتابعين
| Username | Name | Bio | Followers count |
|---|---|---|---|
| FredrikJutfelt | Fredrik Jutfelt 🐠 | Professor @NTNUnorway and @goteborgsuni. Animal physiology, climate change, scientific misconduct jutfelt@mastodon.online | 6076 |
| PaoloMomigliano | Paolo Momigliano | Assistant Professor @HKUSBS. Evolutionary, ecological and conservation genetics of marine critters. #newPI | 438 |
| jim_bouldin | Jim Bouldin | I study vegetation change over the last two centuries in the USA. Also interested in scientific deceit and incompetence. | 262 |
| borna77719234 | borna | - | 0 |
أهم 10 حسابات حسب المتابَعين
| Username | Name | Bio | Followers count |
|---|---|---|---|
| FredrikJutfelt | Fredrik Jutfelt 🐠 | Professor @NTNUnorway and @goteborgsuni. Animal physiology, climate change, scientific misconduct jutfelt@mastodon.online | 3214 |
| PaoloMomigliano | Paolo Momigliano | Assistant Professor @HKUSBS. Evolutionary, ecological and conservation genetics of marine critters. #newPI | 731 |
| jim_bouldin | Jim Bouldin | I study vegetation change over the last two centuries in the USA. Also interested in scientific deceit and incompetence. | 27 |
| borna77719234 | borna | - | 10 |
المستخدمون الأكثر نشاطاً
| Username | Bio | Number of tweets |
|---|---|---|
| jim_bouldin | I study vegetation change over the last two centuries in the USA. Also interested in scientific deceit and incompetence. | 7 |
| PaoloMomigliano | Assistant Professor @HKUSBS. Evolutionary, ecological and conservation genetics of marine critters. #newPI | 4 |
| FredrikJutfelt | Professor @NTNUnorway and @goteborgsuni. Animal physiology, climate change, scientific misconduct jutfelt@mastodon.online | 2 |
| borna77719234 | - | 1 |
التغريدات اليومية
أهم 10 تغريدات حسب إعادة التغريد
| ID | Text | Retweet count |
|---|---|---|
| 1630163010554585094 | @martinenserink @MichaelPriceSci @SciReports #IRGCterrorists#WalkoutIRI#MahsaAmini | 0 |
| 1628560932615106560 | @jim_bouldin @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink It’s not a simple issue. if you claim data are fabricated without excluding other possibilities, you are (rightly) liable. The issue is the content of … | 0 |
| 1628559700727046144 | @jim_bouldin @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink Suspecting and presuming aren’t the same. If you read the thread from which this conversation started, the issue is that the university didn’t share the … | 0 |
| 1628557106474364929 | @PaoloMomigliano @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink No, I'm not. Suspecting and presuming are just slight variations of the same thing, if that. If the system is truly fair, then they'll get … | 0 |
| 1628165818675793922 | @jim_bouldin @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink I am not naïf, and I am reasonably sure the data are fabricated. You are confusing suspecting someone with presuming they are guilty. And you … | 0 |
| 1628054782014377984 | @PaoloMomigliano @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink Which would not be surprising, because there is a very large number of naive people in academia in general. | 0 |
| 1628051860098523136 | @PaoloMomigliano @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink If you think that somebody already known to have fabricated data in one paper, wouldn't be suspect of doing the same in another paper on … | 0 |
| 1627970965853593601 | @jim_bouldin @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink @jim_bouldin this is a terrible thing to say. Try to apply this idea to criminal justice, i.e. reverse the burden of proof for anyone with … | 0 |
| 1627798934373400578 | @PaoloMomigliano @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink They're not independent, they were published by common authors. If you have evidence of fabricated data in one paper, the presumption of innocence in the … | 0 |
| 1627796889390268416 | @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink They're not interested in scientific integrity in terms of what that actually requires. They're interested in claiming that they're interested in scientific integrity. | 0 |
أهم 10 تغريدات حسب الإعجابات
| ID | Text | Like count |
|---|---|---|
| 1630163010554585094 | @martinenserink @MichaelPriceSci @SciReports #IRGCterrorists#WalkoutIRI#MahsaAmini | 0 |
| 1628560932615106560 | @jim_bouldin @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink It’s not a simple issue. if you claim data are fabricated without excluding other possibilities, you are (rightly) liable. The issue is the content of … | 0 |
| 1628559700727046144 | @jim_bouldin @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink Suspecting and presuming aren’t the same. If you read the thread from which this conversation started, the issue is that the university didn’t share the … | 0 |
| 1628557106474364929 | @PaoloMomigliano @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink No, I'm not. Suspecting and presuming are just slight variations of the same thing, if that. If the system is truly fair, then they'll get … | 0 |
| 1628165818675793922 | @jim_bouldin @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink I am not naïf, and I am reasonably sure the data are fabricated. You are confusing suspecting someone with presuming they are guilty. And you … | 0 |
| 1628054782014377984 | @PaoloMomigliano @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink Which would not be surprising, because there is a very large number of naive people in academia in general. | 0 |
| 1628051860098523136 | @PaoloMomigliano @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink If you think that somebody already known to have fabricated data in one paper, wouldn't be suspect of doing the same in another paper on … | 0 |
| 1627970965853593601 | @jim_bouldin @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink @jim_bouldin this is a terrible thing to say. Try to apply this idea to criminal justice, i.e. reverse the burden of proof for anyone with … | 0 |
| 1627798934373400578 | @PaoloMomigliano @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink They're not independent, they were published by common authors. If you have evidence of fabricated data in one paper, the presumption of innocence in the … | 0 |
| 1627796889390268416 | @dom_roche @erik_postma @RSocPublishing @martinenserink They're not interested in scientific integrity in terms of what that actually requires. They're interested in claiming that they're interested in scientific integrity. | 0 |
أهم اللغات المستخدمة
أهم 10 هاشتاقات
| Hashtag | Count |
|---|---|
| #irgcterrorists | 1 |
أهم 10 إشارات
| Mention | Count |
|---|---|
| @martinenserink | 14 |
| @dom_roche | 12 |
| @erik_postma | 12 |
| @rsocpublishing | 12 |
| @jim_bouldin | 5 |
| @paolomomigliano | 4 |
| @michaelpricesci | 1 |
| @scireports | 1 |
سحابة كلمات التغريدات
هل تحتاج تحليل بيانات تويتر مخصص؟
احصل على رؤى مفصلة عن أي كلمة مفتاحية أو هاشتاق أو حساب مع twtData.
ابدأ الآن