Ian Bogost

Ian Bogost

@ibogost

Writer & game designer. Director of Film & Media Studies and Professor of Computer Sci & Eng @WUSTL. Contributing Writer @TheAtlantic.

St. Louis https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Joined 2007-06-15 Date of Analysis: Dec 16, 2025

107,834

Followers

5,527

Following

5,943

Tweets

122.7

Avg Engagement

2,292

Listed

No

Verified

Account Overview

What This Report Covers

This comprehensive analysis examines @ibogost's Twitter/X presence across multiple dimensions. We analyze tweet content, engagement patterns, audience demographics, posting habits, and network connections to provide actionable insights about this account's social media strategy and influence.

Account Classification

  • Account Size: Macro Influencer (100K+)
  • Account Age:2007-06-15
  • Verification:No
  • Location:St. Louis

Data Summary

  • Tweets Analyzed:3,231
  • Avg Likes per Tweet:73.7
  • Avg Retweets per Tweet:49.0
  • Followers Analyzed:9,984

Engagement Analysis

Based on 3,231 tweets

ibogost's tweets receive a high average number of likes and retweets, indicating strong audience interaction. Their content is both controversial and widely shared, suggesting a polarizing yet influential voice.

73.7

Avg Likes/Tweet

49.0

Avg Retweets/Tweet

238,182

Total Likes

158,404

Total Retweets

Engagement Quality Analysis

Median-based metrics that resist fake virality and outliers.

4

Median Likes

0

Median Retweets

22

75th Percentile

91,677

Top Tweet

1.14

Engagement per 1K Followers

Normalized influence metric

Viral Spikes

Engagement Pattern

Few posts get most engagement

Posting Behavior

Content style and format preferences

Conversationalist

Highly engaged in discussions

32.8%

Original

59.6%

Replies

4.6%

Retweets

3.0%

Quotes

0.0%

Threads

0.2%

With Media

31.3%

With Links

0.6%

With #Tags

54.8%

With @Mentions

0.9%

With Emojis

87

Avg Length

Audience Reaction Profile

Conversational

Engages heavily in discussions

1.82

Reply/Original Ratio

0.65

Quote/RT Ratio

Posting Rhythm

Highly Bursty

Posts in concentrated bursts

68.5%

Weekday Posts

31.5%

Weekend Posts

Top Hashtags

#brands (3) #onhere (3) #atari50 (2) #washu23 (1) #wustl (1) #theviewfromseiglehall (1) #asmeawards (1) #carobcurse (1) #washuengineers (1) #supercade (1)

Most Mentioned

@ibogost (54) @isanchezprado (43) @dlberes (39) @theatlantic (37) @toddbarnard (35) @dave_parisi (26) @sevensixfive (25) @timothyaclark (22) @sivavaid (17) @gameism (16)

Want This Report as PDF?

We're building PDF export for these analytics reports. Register your interest to get early access.

Register Interest

Content Strategy Analysis

Based on 3,231 tweets

Content Type Distribution

Content Breakdown

Original Tweets 1,059 (33%)
Replies 1,926 (60%)
Retweets 149 (5%)
Quote Tweets 97 (3%)

What This Reveals About Their Strategy

This account prioritizes community engagement over content broadcasting. With replies making up the majority of their activity, they invest significant time in conversations, building relationships with followers and participating in discussions. This approach typically leads to higher loyalty and more authentic connections.

The 149 retweets (5% of activity) show they also amplify content from others, which helps build relationships with other accounts and provides value to followers by surfacing relevant content.

Posting Patterns & Optimal Timing

Based on 3,231 tweets

Engagement by Hour (UTC)

Posting Frequency Over Time

Timing Insights

Understanding when an account posts and when their audience is most responsive provides valuable competitive intelligence. The charts above show when this account's content receives the most engagement, which often correlates with when their specific audience is most active on the platform.

Peak posting times vary significantly based on an account's audience demographics, timezone distribution, and content type. Accounts with global audiences often see engagement spread across multiple time windows, while those with regional focus may have more concentrated peaks.

Audience Demographics

Based on 9,984 followers

The audience likely includes academics, game developers, and tech enthusiasts interested in media studies and digital culture. They are also drawn to sharp, thought-provoking commentary on modern technology and media trends.

Good

Audience Quality

18.6%

Suspicion Index

14.6%

Low-Quality %

184

Median Reach

Audience Quality Signals

Lower percentages indicate healthier, more authentic followers.

21.1%

Empty Bio

11.9%

<10 Tweets

27.4%

Mass Following (>2K)

0.0%

New (<90 days)

32.6%

Low Ratio (<0.1)

0.0%

New (<180 days)

63.3%

No URL

8.0%

<3 Tweets

Free Mode Analysis: These quality metrics use heuristic signals (empty bios, low tweets, suspicious ratios). For ML-powered bot detection with 95%+ accuracy, use our dedicated tool.

Try Bot Detector

Follower Reach & Influence

This account's followers have their own audiences, creating potential for secondary amplification.

45,170,021

Total Potential Reach

184

Median Follower Reach

724

75th Percentile Reach

20.3%

>1K followers

4.1%

>10K followers

1.0%

>50K followers

0.5%

>100K followers

Creator vs Consumer Split

Classification based on tweet activity: Creators (>100 tweets), Consumers (10-100 tweets), Dormant (<10 tweets).

73.9%

Creators

7,381 accounts

14.2%

Consumers

1,417 accounts

11.9%

Dormant

1,186 accounts

266

Verified Followers

2.66% of total

26.7%

Professional Bios

founder, dev, analyst, etc.

0.2

Median Follow Ratio

follower/following

Follower Influence Distribution

How many followers do their followers have?

Follower Account Age

How long have followers been on Twitter?

Geographic Distribution

Top locations where followers are based (from those who share location data):

Los Angeles, CA (111) New York, NY (87) Brooklyn, NY (87) London (87) Washington, DC (79) London, England (74) Chicago, IL (59) Seattle, WA (54) United States (53) San Francisco, CA (52)

267

Verified Followers

2.67% of total

1,034

Protected Accounts

10.34% of total

9 years

Avg Account Age

of their followers

Notable Followers (By Influence)

Top accounts following this user, sorted by their follower count:

Username Followers Profession Interests
@JohnCena 14,093,475 Wrestler Wrestling, Motivation, Self-promotion
@LeonKrauze 1,583,864 Journalist TV, Journalism, Podcasts
@jonfavs 1,438,191 Podcaster Politics, Media, Podcasting
@depthsofwiki 783,784 Wikipedia Enthusiast Wikipedia, favorite things, fluffybabycow
@carolecadwalla 714,560 Journalist journalism, activism, parenting
@localscale 609,067 Platform Developer impact, acceleration, initiatives
@GonzoTorpedo 558,465 Journalist technology, storytelling, cyborgs
@OccupyDemocrats 552,290 Political Activist Progressive, Grassroots, Politics
@jonnysun 531,377 Writer comedy, illustration, positivity
@duanzi 511,703 Comedian Humor, Entertainment, Life

Top Keywords in Follower Bios

phd (347) writer (346) hehim (340) media (312) game (310) design (277) digital (276) designer (261) sheher (259) tech (243)

Top Hashtags in Follower Bios

#ai (28) #bitcoin (19) #blm (16) #digital (15) #blacklivesmatter (14) #vr (12) #1 (11) #technology (11) #stl (10) #crypto (10)

7,891

Followers With Bio

2,109

Followers Without Bio

78.91%

% With Bio

21.09%

% Without Bio

Why Audience Demographics Matter

Understanding who follows an account reveals the type of influence they hold. Accounts followed primarily by users with few followers indicate broad, mainstream appeal. Those with many high-follower followers have greater potential for content amplification through secondary sharing.

Account age distribution also tells a story: a follower base with many new accounts might indicate recent viral growth, while established followers suggest long-term, stable influence. Geographic data helps understand the cultural context and timezone spread of the audience.

Buy Follower Data

Export full follower list with profile details, bios, locations, and follower counts as CSV.

Buy Followers - from $15

Buy Tweet Data

Export tweets with engagement metrics, timestamps, media, and reply/retweet details as CSV.

Buy Tweets - from $15

Viral Tweets

Top 5 by likes+RTs from 3,231 analyzed

183,966

Combined Engagement

119,448

Total Likes

64,518

Total Retweets

36,793

Avg per Tweet

Key Metrics for Viral Tweets

0%

With Media

0%

With Hashtags

40%

With @Mentions

80%

With Links

Topical Analysis:

Technology Media Culture Academia Critique Digital Culture Game Design

Key Insights & Takeaways

ibogost often critiques modern technology and media trends with a sharp, critical tone. Their tweets frequently highlight absurdity or irony in contemporary digital culture. They blend academic analysis with accessible, engaging commentary on tech and media.

Strengths

  • + Strong engagement rates above platform average
  • + Established follower base of 107,834
  • + High community engagement through conversations
  • + Active presence with consistent posting

Opportunities

  • ~ Optimize posting times for peak engagement windows
  • ~ Analyze top-performing content for replicable patterns
  • ~ Leverage geographic concentration for targeted content
  • ~ Explore collaboration potential with followed accounts

Summary

This analysis of @ibogost reveals an well-established Twitter presence with 107,834 followers. The account demonstrates a conversation-first approach, averaging 122.7 engagements per tweet. Key strengths include consistent posting and an engaged audience, with opportunities to further optimize timing and content strategy based on the patterns identified in this report.

Need Programmatic Access?

We're building an API for developers and researchers. Get access to Twitter data programmatically for your applications and analysis.

Register Interest for API Access

About This Analysis: This analysis is based on a snapshot of followers, following, and recent tweets. It evaluates structure, quality, and behavior, not historical growth. Metrics like growth rate, momentum, churn, or spike analysis require time-series data which is not available from a single snapshot.

Data collected and analyzed by twtData | Analysis date: Dec 16, 2025