pokretura - Tweet Data Analysis

Summarization

This series of tweets are criticizing the negative influence of Serbia and its government on Montenegro, with Pokret snaga crne Gore being accused of colluding with them. Accusations of political and financial corruption are made against Pokret, as well as claims that they have enabled the Serbian-influenced radicalization of the country. The tweets are also criticizing the ruling party, Demokrate and their coalition partner, URA, for their lack of action throughout the political crisis.

Topic Modeling

1. Political corruption and misuse of power
2. Discrimination, Belittling and Marginalization
3. Voter Fraud
4. Economic and Financial Corruption
5. Religious Intolerance and Discrimination

Emotional Analysis

The tweets express a range of emotions including anger, frustration, disappointment, sarcasm, and disbelief. The tweets are directed at @pokretura, a political party, and criticize them for their role in malign influence, stealing votes, and allowing corruption. The tweets also express a sense of injustice and betrayal, as the party is accused of failing to take action against their partners and allies. There is also a sense of irony, as the tweets point out the hypocrisy of the party's words and actions. Finally, there is a sense of hope that justice will eventually be served.

Trend Analysis

1. Criticism of Serbia's influence
2. Power struggle between political parties
3. Criticism of governments misuse of power
4. Voter suppression and illegal activities by government
5. Illegal land acquisition and favouritism