Center for Inquiry

Center for Inquiry

@center4inquiry

We're working to foster a secular society based on science, reason, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values. Home of @rdfrs, @SkeptInquirer, and @FreeInquiry.

Amherst, NY / Washington, DC https://www.centerforinquiry.org/ Joined 2009-02-16 Date of Analysis: Dec 16, 2025

59,645

Followers

4,243

Following

35,547

Tweets

11.6

Avg Engagement

1,148

Listed

No

Verified

Account Overview

What This Report Covers

This comprehensive analysis examines @center4inquiry's Twitter/X presence across multiple dimensions. We analyze tweet content, engagement patterns, audience demographics, posting habits, and network connections to provide actionable insights about this account's social media strategy and influence.

Account Classification

  • Account Size: Mid-Tier (10K+)
  • Account Age:2009-02-16
  • Verification:No
  • Location:Amherst, NY / Washington, DC

Data Summary

  • Tweets Analyzed:3,220
  • Avg Likes per Tweet:5.5
  • Avg Retweets per Tweet:6.1
  • Followers Analyzed:10,000

Engagement Analysis

Based on 3,220 tweets

The account has moderate engagement with an average of 228 likes and 74 retweets per tweet. The content often sparks debate and discussion, especially on controversial topics.

5.5

Avg Likes/Tweet

6.1

Avg Retweets/Tweet

17,803

Total Likes

19,592

Total Retweets

Engagement Quality Analysis

Median-based metrics that resist fake virality and outliers.

3

Median Likes

1

Median Retweets

8

75th Percentile

5,522

Top Tweet

0.19

Engagement per 1K Followers

Normalized influence metric

Viral Spikes

Engagement Pattern

Few posts get most engagement

Posting Behavior

Content style and format preferences

Conversationalist

Highly engaged in discussions

27.2%

Original

56.7%

Replies

14.3%

Retweets

1.8%

Quotes

0.0%

Threads

0.5%

With Media

90.9%

With Links

28.6%

With #Tags

46.2%

With @Mentions

5.6%

With Emojis

210

Avg Length

Audience Reaction Profile

Conversational

Engages heavily in discussions

2.08

Reply/Original Ratio

0.12

Quote/RT Ratio

Posting Rhythm

Highly Bursty

Posts in concentrated bursts

96.4%

Weekday Posts

3.6%

Weekend Posts

Top Hashtags

#morningheresy (143) #csicon (142) #sciencesaves (45) #science (28) #csicon2022 (22) #scotus (22) #homeopathy (21) #pseudoscience (20) #skepticism (19) #skeptical (18)

Most Mentioned

@skeptinquirer (232) @center4inquiry (172) @freeinquiry (96) @richarddawkins (76) @sciencesavesorg (70) @neiltyson (57) @thinkingpowers (49) @rdfrs (45) @flamingovegas (42) @caulfieldtim (28)

Want This Report as PDF?

We're building PDF export for these analytics reports. Register your interest to get early access.

Register Interest

Content Strategy Analysis

Based on 3,220 tweets

Content Type Distribution

Content Breakdown

Original Tweets 876 (27%)
Replies 1,826 (57%)
Retweets 461 (14%)
Quote Tweets 57 (2%)

What This Reveals About Their Strategy

This account prioritizes community engagement over content broadcasting. With replies making up the majority of their activity, they invest significant time in conversations, building relationships with followers and participating in discussions. This approach typically leads to higher loyalty and more authentic connections.

The 461 retweets (14% of activity) show they also amplify content from others, which helps build relationships with other accounts and provides value to followers by surfacing relevant content.

Posting Patterns & Optimal Timing

Based on 3,220 tweets

Engagement by Hour (UTC)

Posting Frequency Over Time

Timing Insights

Understanding when an account posts and when their audience is most responsive provides valuable competitive intelligence. The charts above show when this account's content receives the most engagement, which often correlates with when their specific audience is most active on the platform.

Peak posting times vary significantly based on an account's audience demographics, timezone distribution, and content type. Accounts with global audiences often see engagement spread across multiple time windows, while those with regional focus may have more concentrated peaks.

Audience Demographics

Based on 10,000 followers

The audience likely includes individuals interested in science, humanism, and social justice. They are probably engaged in discussions around reproductive rights, religious influence, and scientific literacy.

Average

Audience Quality

21.4%

Suspicion Index

20.7%

Low-Quality %

77

Median Reach

Audience Quality Signals

Lower percentages indicate healthier, more authentic followers.

30.9%

Empty Bio

16.3%

<10 Tweets

20.7%

Mass Following (>2K)

0.0%

New (<90 days)

44.1%

Low Ratio (<0.1)

0.0%

New (<180 days)

79.6%

No URL

10.5%

<3 Tweets

Free Mode Analysis: These quality metrics use heuristic signals (empty bios, low tweets, suspicious ratios). For ML-powered bot detection with 95%+ accuracy, use our dedicated tool.

Try Bot Detector

Follower Reach & Influence

This account's followers have their own audiences, creating potential for secondary amplification.

17,954,156

Total Potential Reach

77

Median Follower Reach

369

75th Percentile Reach

13.3%

>1K followers

2.0%

>10K followers

0.5%

>50K followers

0.2%

>100K followers

Creator vs Consumer Split

Classification based on tweet activity: Creators (>100 tweets), Consumers (10-100 tweets), Dormant (<10 tweets).

67.4%

Creators

6,736 accounts

16.4%

Consumers

1,638 accounts

16.3%

Dormant

1,626 accounts

155

Verified Followers

1.55% of total

12.9%

Professional Bios

founder, dev, analyst, etc.

0.12

Median Follow Ratio

follower/following

Follower Influence Distribution

How many followers do their followers have?

Follower Account Age

How long have followers been on Twitter?

Geographic Distribution

Top locations where followers are based (from those who share location data):

United States (103) London, England (59) Earth (54) Canada (52) London (52) India (47) New York, NY (46) Los Angeles, CA (45) Washington, DC (41) California, USA (41)

155

Verified Followers

1.55% of total

1,124

Protected Accounts

11.24% of total

7 years

Avg Account Age

of their followers

Notable Followers (By Influence)

Top accounts following this user, sorted by their follower count:

Username Followers Profession Interests
@jordanbpeterson 4,374,350 Psychologist Education, Psychology, Podcasts
@mental_floss 745,508 Trivia Website Facts, History, Pop culture
@Matt_VanDyke 513,056 Founder veterans, training, supplies
@eliistender10 407,286 Author Books, Podcasting, Music
@BridgetPhetasy 363,146 Writer nobody, tribeless, hero
@edstetzer 264,941 Theologian Family, Work, Ministry
@arielpalacios 243,624 Journalist News, Sports, Argentina
@LarrySabato 204,074 Political Analyst Politics, Author, UVA
@KenDBerryMD 163,514 Physician Low-carb, Health, Nutrition
@IvanMattaF 152,231 Multifaceted Books, Podcasting, Illustration

Top Keywords in Follower Bios

science (409) atheist (311) writer (212) love (211) life (203) humanist (188) lover (181) human (162) sheher (157) world (155)

Top Hashtags in Follower Bios

#atheist (44) #blm (43) #science (26) #resist (24) #humanist (14) #blacklivesmatter (14) #mentalhealth (13) #atheism (12) #lgbtq (12) #voteblue (10)

6,913

Followers With Bio

3,087

Followers Without Bio

69.13%

% With Bio

30.87%

% Without Bio

Why Audience Demographics Matter

Understanding who follows an account reveals the type of influence they hold. Accounts followed primarily by users with few followers indicate broad, mainstream appeal. Those with many high-follower followers have greater potential for content amplification through secondary sharing.

Account age distribution also tells a story: a follower base with many new accounts might indicate recent viral growth, while established followers suggest long-term, stable influence. Geographic data helps understand the cultural context and timezone spread of the audience.

Buy Follower Data

Export full follower list with profile details, bios, locations, and follower counts as CSV.

Buy Followers - from $15

Buy Tweet Data

Export tweets with engagement metrics, timestamps, media, and reply/retweet details as CSV.

Buy Tweets - from $15

Viral Tweets

Top 5 by likes+RTs from 3,220 analyzed

9,422

Combined Engagement

1,142

Total Likes

8,280

Total Retweets

1,884

Avg per Tweet

Key Metrics for Viral Tweets

0%

With Media

20%

With Hashtags

60%

With @Mentions

60%

With Links

Topical Analysis:

Science Humanism Reproductive Rights Secularism Social Justice Religious Influence Freedom Of Inquiry

Key Insights & Takeaways

The account frequently addresses reproductive rights and religious influence on policy, which indicates a focus on social justice issues. It uses emotionally charged language to highlight the impact of policies on individuals, which can drive engagement and debate. The account is active in sharing content that challenges religious and political norms, suggesting a strong stance on secularism and humanist values.

Strengths

  • + Established follower base of 59,645
  • + High community engagement through conversations
  • + Active presence with consistent posting

Opportunities

  • ~ Optimize posting times for peak engagement windows
  • ~ Analyze top-performing content for replicable patterns
  • ~ Leverage geographic concentration for targeted content
  • ~ Explore collaboration potential with followed accounts

Summary

This analysis of @center4inquiry reveals an growing Twitter presence with 59,645 followers. The account demonstrates a conversation-first approach, averaging 11.6 engagements per tweet. Key strengths include consistent posting and an engaged audience, with opportunities to further optimize timing and content strategy based on the patterns identified in this report.

Need Programmatic Access?

We're building an API for developers and researchers. Get access to Twitter data programmatically for your applications and analysis.

Register Interest for API Access

About This Analysis: This analysis is based on a snapshot of followers, following, and recent tweets. It evaluates structure, quality, and behavior, not historical growth. Metrics like growth rate, momentum, churn, or spike analysis require time-series data which is not available from a single snapshot.

Data collected and analyzed by twtData | Analysis date: Dec 16, 2025