March For Science

March For Science

@MarchForScience

Fighting for science, climate action, public health, and justice. Donate: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/march-for-science-action?refcode=Twp

https://t.co/0r3kgNWUh9 Joined 2017-01-23 Date of Analysis: Dec 16, 2025

293,124

Followers

1,763

Following

23,406

Tweets

1,536.7

Avg Engagement

2,406

Listed

No

Verified

Account Overview

What This Report Covers

This comprehensive analysis examines @MarchForScience's Twitter/X presence across multiple dimensions. We analyze tweet content, engagement patterns, audience demographics, posting habits, and network connections to provide actionable insights about this account's social media strategy and influence.

Account Classification

  • Account Size: Macro Influencer (100K+)
  • Account Age:2017-01-23
  • Verification:No
  • Location:Not specified

Data Summary

  • Tweets Analyzed:3,201
  • Avg Likes per Tweet:28.8
  • Avg Retweets per Tweet:1,507.9
  • Followers Analyzed:50,000

Engagement Analysis

Based on 3,201 tweets

The account maintains a consistent level of engagement, with an average of 2,900 likes and 652 retweets per tweet. Its content often generates emotional responses, as seen in the high engagement with empathetic and thought-provoking tweets.

28.8

Avg Likes/Tweet

1,507.9

Avg Retweets/Tweet

92,235

Total Likes

4,826,677

Total Retweets

Engagement Quality Analysis

Median-based metrics that resist fake virality and outliers.

0

Median Likes

110

Median Retweets

747

75th Percentile

419,694

Top Tweet

5.24

Engagement per 1K Followers

Normalized influence metric

Viral Spikes

Engagement Pattern

Few posts get most engagement

Posting Behavior

Content style and format preferences

Curator

Amplifies others content frequently

10.8%

Original

5.1%

Replies

79.0%

Retweets

5.1%

Quotes

0.0%

Threads

0.3%

With Media

22.9%

With Links

17.4%

With #Tags

86.1%

With @Mentions

7.7%

With Emojis

138

Avg Length

Audience Reaction Profile

Interactive

Balances broadcasting with conversation

0.47

Reply/Original Ratio

0.06

Quote/RT Ratio

Posting Rhythm

Highly Bursty

Posts in concentrated bursts

81.0%

Weekday Posts

19.0%

Weekend Posts

Top Hashtags

#covid19 (52) #cop26 (52) #longcovid (27) #sciencenotsilence (21) #hoodmedchats (19) #letsgetfactsinated (18) #marchforscience (17) #covid (15) #climateaction (14) #sciencetwitter (11)

Most Mentioned

@luckytran (733) @sciencemarchnyc (144) @hood_medicine (80) @marchforscience (66) @myrabatchelder (59) @mandatemasksny (46) @ingridjoylyn (40) @uche_blackstock (37) @govkathyhochul (29) @drtomfrieden (28)

Want This Report as PDF?

We're building PDF export for these analytics reports. Register your interest to get early access.

Register Interest

Content Strategy Analysis

Based on 3,201 tweets

Content Type Distribution

Content Breakdown

Original Tweets 346 (11%)
Replies 162 (5%)
Retweets 2,529 (79%)
Quote Tweets 164 (5%)

What This Reveals About Their Strategy

This is a content-creator focused account that primarily shares original thoughts, ideas, and media. With original content dominating their feed, they position themselves as a source of new information rather than a curator. This strategy works well for establishing thought leadership.

The 2,529 retweets (79% of activity) show they also amplify content from others, which helps build relationships with other accounts and provides value to followers by surfacing relevant content.

Posting Patterns & Optimal Timing

Based on 3,201 tweets

Engagement by Hour (UTC)

Posting Frequency Over Time

Timing Insights

Understanding when an account posts and when their audience is most responsive provides valuable competitive intelligence. The charts above show when this account's content receives the most engagement, which often correlates with when their specific audience is most active on the platform.

Peak posting times vary significantly based on an account's audience demographics, timezone distribution, and content type. Accounts with global audiences often see engagement spread across multiple time windows, while those with regional focus may have more concentrated peaks.

Audience Demographics

Based on 50,000 followers

The audience likely includes scientists, educators, activists, and individuals concerned with public health and environmental issues. They are engaged with content that sparks discussion and debate.

Average

Audience Quality

24.6%

Suspicion Index

25.6%

Low-Quality %

42

Median Reach

Audience Quality Signals

Lower percentages indicate healthier, more authentic followers.

30.0%

Empty Bio

29.7%

<10 Tweets

17.1%

Mass Following (>2K)

0.0%

New (<90 days)

48.7%

Low Ratio (<0.1)

0.0%

New (<180 days)

80.5%

No URL

21.3%

<3 Tweets

Free Mode Analysis: These quality metrics use heuristic signals (empty bios, low tweets, suspicious ratios). For ML-powered bot detection with 95%+ accuracy, use our dedicated tool.

Try Bot Detector

Follower Reach & Influence

This account's followers have their own audiences, creating potential for secondary amplification.

101,192,650

Total Potential Reach

42

Median Follower Reach

276

75th Percentile Reach

10.7%

>1K followers

1.6%

>10K followers

0.4%

>50K followers

0.2%

>100K followers

Creator vs Consumer Split

Classification based on tweet activity: Creators (>100 tweets), Consumers (10-100 tweets), Dormant (<10 tweets).

53.3%

Creators

26,660 accounts

17.0%

Consumers

8,512 accounts

29.7%

Dormant

14,828 accounts

621

Verified Followers

1.24% of total

12.1%

Professional Bios

founder, dev, analyst, etc.

0.11

Median Follow Ratio

follower/following

Follower Influence Distribution

How many followers do their followers have?

Follower Account Age

How long have followers been on Twitter?

Geographic Distribution

Top locations where followers are based (from those who share location data):

United States (557) Washington, DC (252) Los Angeles, CA (241) New York, NY (234) India (222) California, USA (219) Chicago, IL (174) New York, USA (172) USA (144) Boston, MA (141)

1,276

Verified Followers

1.28% of total

10,313

Protected Accounts

10.31% of total

8 years

Avg Account Age

of their followers

Notable Followers (By Influence)

Top accounts following this user, sorted by their follower count:

Username Followers Profession Interests
@JohnCena 14,102,330 Wrestler Wrestling, Motivation, Self-promotion
@AOC 13,429,189 Politician politics, social justice, equality
@GretaThunberg 5,818,327 Activist Climate activism, Environmentalism, Asperger's
@sciam 4,199,262 Science Communication Science, Discoveries, Insights
@paulwesley 4,157,099 Actor acting, directing, sustainability
@PeteButtigieg 3,713,193 Politician politics, family, writing
@Alyssa_Milano 3,500,641 - -
@jaketapper 3,164,031 Journalist News, Politics, Journalism
@Gizmodo 2,758,800 Tech Blogger Technology, Science, Future
@SleepintheGardn 2,247,563 Actor Actor, Writer, Dancer

Top Keywords in Follower Bios

science (5,085) sheher (3,193) love (2,782) phd (2,256) student (2,220) mom (2,220) lover (2,159) life (2,109) world (1,669) health (1,643)

Top Hashtags in Follower Bios

#resist (806) #blm (592) #blacklivesmatter (454) #theresistance (349) #science (302) #resistance (235) #scicomm (217) #fbr (204) #voteblue (146) #climatechange (131)

66,897

Followers With Bio

33,103

Followers Without Bio

66.9%

% With Bio

33.1%

% Without Bio

Why Audience Demographics Matter

Understanding who follows an account reveals the type of influence they hold. Accounts followed primarily by users with few followers indicate broad, mainstream appeal. Those with many high-follower followers have greater potential for content amplification through secondary sharing.

Account age distribution also tells a story: a follower base with many new accounts might indicate recent viral growth, while established followers suggest long-term, stable influence. Geographic data helps understand the cultural context and timezone spread of the audience.

Buy Follower Data

Export full follower list with profile details, bios, locations, and follower counts as CSV.

Buy Followers - from $15

Buy Tweet Data

Export tweets with engagement metrics, timestamps, media, and reply/retweet details as CSV.

Buy Tweets - from $15

Viral Tweets

Top 5 by likes+RTs from 3,201 analyzed

807,996

Combined Engagement

0

Total Likes

807,996

Total Retweets

161,599

Avg per Tweet

Key Metrics for Viral Tweets

0%

With Media

0%

With Hashtags

100%

With @Mentions

20%

With Links

Topical Analysis:

Science Climate Action Public Health Justice Vaccine Hesitancy Social Justice Scientific Integrity

Key Insights & Takeaways

The account frequently highlights controversial topics such as vaccine hesitancy, emphasizing the importance of scientific integrity. It uses emotional and rhetorical questions to provoke reflection and discussion on critical issues like public health and climate change. The account's content often sparks debate, indicating a strong and active audience interested in science and social justice.

Strengths

  • + Strong engagement rates above platform average
  • + Established follower base of 293,124
  • + Strong original content creation
  • + Active presence with consistent posting

Opportunities

  • ~ Optimize posting times for peak engagement windows
  • ~ Analyze top-performing content for replicable patterns
  • ~ Leverage geographic concentration for targeted content
  • ~ Explore collaboration potential with followed accounts

Summary

This analysis of @MarchForScience reveals an exceptionally influential Twitter presence with 293,124 followers. The account demonstrates a content-creator strategy, averaging 1,536.7 engagements per tweet. Key strengths include consistent posting and an engaged audience, with opportunities to further optimize timing and content strategy based on the patterns identified in this report.

Need Programmatic Access?

We're building an API for developers and researchers. Get access to Twitter data programmatically for your applications and analysis.

Register Interest for API Access

About This Analysis: This analysis is based on a snapshot of followers, following, and recent tweets. It evaluates structure, quality, and behavior, not historical growth. Metrics like growth rate, momentum, churn, or spike analysis require time-series data which is not available from a single snapshot.

Data collected and analyzed by twtData | Analysis date: Dec 16, 2025